↓ Skip to main content

The intake of high fat diet with different trans fatty acid levels differentially induces oxidative stress and non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The intake of high fat diet with different trans fatty acid levels differentially induces oxidative stress and non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in rats
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-8-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madiha Dhibi, Faten Brahmi, Amira Mnari, Zohra Houas, Issam Chargui, Linda Bchir, Noureddine Gazzah, Mohammed A Alsaif, Mohamed Hammami

Abstract

Trans-fatty acids (TFA) are known as a risk factor for coronary artery diseases, insulin resistance and obesity accompanied by systemic inflammation, the features of metabolic syndrome. Little is known about the effects on the liver induced by lipids and also few studies are focused on the effect of foods rich in TFAs on hepatic functions and oxidative stress. This study investigates whether high-fat diets with different TFA levels induce oxidative stress and liver dysfunction in rats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 183 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 20%
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#16,061,963
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#648
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,594
of 141,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.