You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of strategies to facilitate uptake or implementation of complex interventions: A systematic review of reviews
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-10-s1-a67 |
Authors |
Rosa Lau, Fiona Stevenson, Bie Nio Ong, Krysia Dziedzic, Shaun Treweek, Sandra Eldridge, Hazel Everitt, Anne Kennedy, Nadeem Qureshi, Anne Rogers, Richard Peacock, Elizabeth Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
Australia | 2 | 22% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 56% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
Psychology | 2 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,646,376
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,067
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,680
of 277,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#28
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.