↓ Skip to main content

Anemia prevalence and incidence and red blood cell transfusion practices in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a multicenter cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anemia prevalence and incidence and red blood cell transfusion practices in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a multicenter cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13054-018-2089-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shane W. English, Michaël Chassé, Alexis F. Turgeon, François Lauzier, Donald Griesdale, Allan Garland, Dean Fergusson, Ryan Zarychanski, Carl van Walraven, Kaitlyn Montroy, Jennifer Ziegler, Raphael Dupont-Chouinard, Raphaëlle Carignan, Andy Dhaliwal, Ranjeeta Mallick, John Sinclair, Amélie Boutin, Giuseppe Pagliarello, Alan Tinmouth, Lauralyn McIntyre, on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

Abstract

Whether a restrictive strategy for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is applied to patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is unclear. To inform the design and conduct of a future clinical trial, we sought to describe transfusion practices, hemoglobin (Hb) triggers, and predictors of RBC transfusion in patients with aSAH. This is a retrospective cohort study of all consecutively admitted adult patients with aSAH at four tertiary care centers from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013. Patients were identified from hospital administrative discharge records and existing local aSAH databases. Data collection by trained abstractors included demographic data, aSAH characteristics, Hb and transfusion data, other major aSAH cointerventions, and outcomes using a pretested case report form with standardized procedures. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data, and regression models were used to identify associations between anemia, transfusion, and other relevant predictors and outcome. A total of 527 patients met inclusion eligibility. Mean (±SD) age was 57 ± 13 years, and 357 patients (67.7%) were female. The median modified Fisher grade was 4 (IQR 3-4). Mean nadir Hb was 98 ± 20 g/L and occurred on median admission day 4 (IQR 2-11). RBC transfusion occurred in 100 patients (19.0%). Transfusion rates varied across centers (12.1-27.4%, p = 0.02). Patients received a median of 1 RBC unit (IQR 1-2) per transfusion episode and a median total of 2 units (IQR 1-4). Median pretransfusion Hb for first transfusion was 79 g/L (IQR 74-93) and did not vary substantially across centers (78-82 g/L, p = 0.37). Of patients with nadir Hb < 80 g/L, 66.3% received a transfusion compared with 2.0% with Hb nadir ≥ 100 g/L (p < 0.0001). Predictors of transfusion were history of oral anticoagulant use, anterior circulation aneurysm, neurosurgical clipping, and lower Hb. Controlling for numerous potential confounders, transfusion was not independently associated with poor outcome. We observed that moderate anemia remains very common early in admission following SAH. Only one-fifth of patients with SAH received RBC transfusions, mostly in cases of significant anemia (Hb < 80 g/L), and this did not appear to be associated with outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 48%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,711,927
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,842
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,418
of 341,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#55
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.