Title |
Blunt cerebrovascular injury in elderly fall patients: are we screening enough?
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13017-018-0188-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vincent P. Anto, Joshua B. Brown, Andrew B. Peitzman, Brian S. Zuckerbraun, Matthew D. Neal, Gregory Watson, Raquel Forsythe, Timothy R. Billiar, Jason L. Sperry |
Abstract |
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) are generally associated with high-energy injury mechanisms. Less is known regarding lower-energy injuries in elderly patients. We sought to determine the incidence of BCVI and characterize current BCVI screening practices and associated complications in elderly ground-level fall patients (EGLF, ≥ 65 years). We hypothesized that BCVI in EGLF patients would be clinically significant and screening would be less common. A retrospective study was performed utilizing the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB, 2007-2014) and single institutional data. BCVI risk factors and diagnosis were determined by ICD-9 codes. Presenting patient characteristics and clinical course were obtained by chart review. The NTDB dataset was used to determine the incidence of BCVI, risk factors for BCVI, and outcomes in the EGLF cohort. Local chart review focused on screening rates and complications. The incidence of BCVI in EGLF patients was 0.15% overall and 0.86% in those with at least one BCVI risk factor in the NTDB. Upper cervical spine fractures were the most common risk factor for BCVI in EGLF patients. In EGLF patients, the diagnosis of BCVI was an independent risk factor for mortality (OR1.8, 95% C.I. 1.5-2.1). The local institutional data (2007-2014) had a BCVI incidence of 0.37% (n = 6487) and 1.47% in those with at least one risk factor (n = 1429). EGLF patients with a risk factor for BCVI had a very low rate of screening (44%). Only 8% of EGLF patients not screened had documented contraindications. The incidence of renal injury was 9% irrespective of BCVI screening. The incidence of BCVI is clinically significant in EGLF patients and an independent predictor of mortality. Screening is less common in EGLF patients despite few contraindications. This data suggests that using age and injury mechanism to omit BCVI screening in EGLF patients may exclude an at-risk population. IRB approval number: PRO15020269. Retrospective trial not registered. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 60% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 23% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |