↓ Skip to main content

Towards a health-enabling working environment - developing and testing interventions to decrease HIV and TB stigma among healthcare workers in the Free State, South Africa: study protocol for a…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a health-enabling working environment - developing and testing interventions to decrease HIV and TB stigma among healthcare workers in the Free State, South Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2713-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asta Rau, Edwin Wouters, Michelle Engelbrecht, Caroline Masquillier, Kerry Uebel, Gladys Kigozi, Nina Sommerland, André Janse van Rensburg

Abstract

Occupational exposure to tuberculosis (TB) constitutes a major health risk for healthcare workers (HCWs). The HIV epidemic equally affects the workforce because of the mutually reinforcing epidemiology of HIV and TB. Stigmas associated with HIV and TB have become so intricately entangled that they stop some HCWs from seeking care in a context where serious shortages in human resources for health besiege public health facilities. It is thus imperative to research, as well as attempt to tackle, HIV and TB stigma among HCWs. But little has been done internationally-and nationally, only our own exploratory studies. Our project aims to address this by (1) scientifically assessing the extent and sources of HIV and TB-related stigma among HCWs and (2) developing and testing evidence-based, stigma-reduction interventions in public hospitals in the Free State Province of South Africa. The research follows a stratified cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. Pre intervention, a self-administered questionnaire with the pilot study's validated stigma scales is used to measure stigma and other key variables among randomly selected HCWs in eight hospitals-stratified by size and district and then randomly allocated to four intervention and four control sites. Interventions comprise HIV- and TB-stigma reduction activities-mainly Social and Behavioural Change Communication (SBCC) interventions-at three social-ecology levels (individual, community, and socio-structural). An outside assessor will appraise the trial mid-way through implementation. Post intervention, all baseline respondents will be followed up to complete the baseline questionnaire with additional items on interventions. Qualitative data will be collected to better understand HIV and TB stigma and explore if, and how, interventions impact stigma levels in the workplace. The study regards as HCWs all staff, working in all different types of jobs, at all levels in the hospitals. Thus, the research addresses HIV and TB stigma across the whole workforce and the entire workplace. In doing so it will (1) generate essential information on stigma among HCWs and (2) implement stigma-reduction interventions that are innovative yet replicable, and potentially beneficial in addressing a pernicious human-rights-based issue. South African National Clinical Trials Register, registration ID: DOH-27-1115-5204 . Prospectively registered on 26 August 2015.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 53 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Psychology 11 7%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 60 38%