↓ Skip to main content

SvO2 to monitor resuscitation of septic patients: let's just understand the basic physiology

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SvO2 to monitor resuscitation of septic patients: let's just understand the basic physiology
Published in
Critical Care, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Teboul, Olfa Hamzaoui, Xavier Monnet

Abstract

Real-time monitoring of mixed venous oxygen blood saturation (SvO2) or of central venous oxygen blood saturation is often used during resuscitation of septic shock. However, the meaning of these parameters is far from straightforward. In the present commentary, we emphasize that SvO2--a global marker of tissue oxygen balance--can never be simplistically used as a marker of preload responsiveness, which is an intrinsic marker of cardiac performance. In some septic shock patients, because of profound hypovolemia or myocardial dysfunction, SvO2 can be low but obviously cannot alone indicate whether a fluid challenge would increase cardiac output. In other patients, because of a profound impairment of oxygen extraction capacities, SvO2 can be abnormally high even in patients who are still able to respond positively to fluid infusion. In any case, other reliable dynamic parameters can help to address the important question of fluid responsiveness/unresponsiveness. However, whether fluid administration in fluid responders and high SvO2 would be efficacious to reduce tissue dysoxia in the most injured tissues is still uncertain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 19%
Student > Postgraduate 16 17%
Researcher 14 15%
Professor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 69%
Engineering 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,805
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,844
of 154,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#35
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.