↓ Skip to main content

Specialist mental health services in England in 2014: overview of funding, access and levels of care

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 766)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Specialist mental health services in England in 2014: overview of funding, access and levels of care
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13033-015-0023-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Docherty, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract

Since the economic recession began in 2008 anecdotal reports suggest that mental health services in England have experienced disinvestment, but published data to test this proposition are few. This paper presents information from a wider range of official, research and grey literature sources aiming to: (1) assess whether governmental investment in publically funded mental health services has declined since the start of the economic recession in 2008; (2) to assess whether relative changes in mental health service investment over this period were or were not similar to trends in national investment in services for people with physical disorders, and (3) to interpret these findings in terms of met and unmet population levels needs for mental health care. The key findings are that: across England social service expenditure reductions have led to a decrease of 48 % in the number of people with mental illness who receive such care, while direct NHS expenditure was reduced in some local areas by up to 32 %. The results of this overview suggest that there have been substantial reductions in the resources dedicated to mental health treatment and care in England since 2008, that such reductions seem not to have been applied to physical health services, and that these findings appear to run counter to the government policy of 'parity of esteem; for mental and physical healthcare.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 25%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 18%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,218,644
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#36
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,043
of 277,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them