You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-11-201 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gillian Wheater, Mohsen Elshahaly, Stephen P Tuck, Harish K Datta, Jacob M van Laar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 330 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 15% |
| Researcher | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 81 | 24% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 11% |
| Unknown | 74 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,759,367
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#839
of 4,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,175
of 212,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#14
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.