↓ Skip to main content

Informal caregivers of clients with neurological conditions: profiles, patterns and risk factors for distress from a home care prevalence study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Informal caregivers of clients with neurological conditions: profiles, patterns and risk factors for distress from a home care prevalence study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-1010-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori A. Mitchell, John Hirdes, Jeff W. Poss, Caroline Slegers-Boyd, Hilary Caldarelli, Lynn Martin

Abstract

Individuals living in the community with neurological conditions receive the majority of their care from informal caregivers. The purpose of this project was to provide a profile of caregivers of home care clients with neurological conditions. The study also examined prevalence of caregiver distress and the association between neurological conditions and other client and caregiver characteristics with distress. The study population included Canadian home care clients in the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority in Manitoba and in the province of Ontario. Clients with RAI-Home Care (RAI-HC) assessment data from 2003 to 2010 were examined. Neurological conditions of interest included Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Huntington disease, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and stroke. Descriptive statistics were analyzed to describe home care client characteristics and caregiver characteristics for each neurological condition. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with caregiver distress. A substantial proportion of home care clients were found to have one or more of the neurological conditions (38.8 % to 41.9 %). Caregiver distress was twice as prevalent among caregivers of clients with neurological conditions (28.0 %). The largest associations with caregiver distress were the amount of informal care hours provided in a week and the MAPLe algorithm, an indicator of a client's level of priority for care. After adjustment for client characteristics, Huntington disease was the neurological condition most strongly associated with caregiver distress. However, clients' clinical characteristics and informal care hours had a stronger association with caregiver distress than the presence of a neurological condition. Provision of formal home care services provided a protective effect from caregiver distress. Neurological conditions are common among home care clients and a significant proportion of informal caregivers providing care to these clients experience distress. The complexity of clients with neurological conditions suggests the need for multicomponent support strategies for informal caregivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 58 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 17%
Psychology 25 12%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 62 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#16,769,630
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,118
of 8,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,095
of 273,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#111
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.