↓ Skip to main content

Health and economic impact of HIV/AIDS on South African households: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health and economic impact of HIV/AIDS on South African households: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2003
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-3-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max O Bachmann, Frederick LR Booysen

Abstract

South African households are severely affected by human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) but health and economic impacts have not been quantified in controlled cohort studies. We compared households with an HIV-infected member, and unaffected neighbouring households, in one rural and one urban area in Free State province, South Africa. Interviews were conducted with one key informant in each household, at baseline and six months later. We studied 1913 members of 404 households, with 94% and 96% follow up, respectively. Household and individual level analyses were done. Members of affected households, compared to members of unaffected households, were independently more likely to be continuously ill (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4 at follow up), and to die (adjusted OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0-11), mainly due to infectious diseases. Government clinics and hospitals were the main sources of health care. Affected households were poorer than unaffected households at baseline (relative income per person 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.76). Over six months expenditure and income decreased more rapidly in affected than in unaffected households (baseline-adjusted relative expenditure 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99 and income 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05). Baseline morbidity was independently associated with lower income and expenditure at baseline but not with changes over six months. HIV/AIDS affects the health and wealth of households as well as infected individuals, aggravating pre-existing poverty.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 15%
Social Sciences 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,278,978
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,777
of 14,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,785
of 51,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.