↓ Skip to main content

Response and participation of underserved populations after a three-step invitation strategy for a cardiometabolic health check

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response and participation of underserved populations after a three-step invitation strategy for a cardiometabolic health check
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2139-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Groenenberg, Mathilde R. Crone, Sandra van Dijk, Jamila Ben Meftah, Barend J. C. Middelkoop, Willem J. J. Assendelft, Anne M. Stiggelbout

Abstract

Ethnic minority and native Dutch groups with a low socioeconomic status (SES) are underrepresented in cardiometabolic health checks, despite being at higher risk. We investigated response and participation rates using three consecutive inexpensive-to-costly culturally adapted invitation steps for a health risk assessment (HRA) and further testing of high-risk individuals during prevention consultations (PC). A total of 1690 non-Western immigrants and native Dutch with a low SES (35-70 years) from six GP practices were eligible for participation. We used a 'funnelled' invitation design comprising three increasingly cost-intensive steps: (1) all patients received a postal invitation; (2) postal non-responders were approached by telephone; (3) final non-responders were approached face-to-face by their GP. The effect of ethnicity, ethnic mix of GP practice, and patient characteristics (gender, age, SES) on response and participation were assessed by means of logistic regression analyses. Overall response was 70 % (n = 1152), of whom 62 % (n = 712) participated in the HRA. This was primarily accomplished through the postal and telephone invitations. Participants from GP practices in the most deprived neighbourhoods had the lowest response and HRA participation rates. Of the HRA participants, 29 % (n = 207) were considered high-risk, of whom 59 % (n = 123) participated in the PC. PC participation was lowest among native Dutch with a low SES. Underserved populations can be reached by a low-cost culturally adapted postal approach with a reminder and follow-up telephone calls. The added value of the more expensive face-to-face invitation was negligible. PC participation rates were acceptable. Efforts should be particularly targeted at practices in the most deprived areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Psychology 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,345,593
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,344
of 14,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,610
of 266,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#239
of 329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.