↓ Skip to main content

Loop diuretics in acute heart failure: beyond the decongestive relief for the kidney

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
90 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Loop diuretics in acute heart failure: beyond the decongestive relief for the kidney
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-1017-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Palazzuoli, Gaetano Ruocco, Claudio Ronco, Peter A. McCullough

Abstract

Current goals in the acute treatment of heart failure are focused on pulmonary and systemic decongestion with loop diuretics as the cornerstone of therapy. Despite rapid relief of symptoms in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, after intravenous use of loop diuretics, the use of these agents has been consistently associated with adverse events, including hypokalemia, azotemia, hypotension, and increased mortality. Two recent randomized trials have shown that continuous infusions of loop diuretics did not offer benefit but were associated with adverse events, including hyponatremia, prolonged hospital stay, and increased rate of readmissions. This is probably due to the limitations of congestion evaluation as well as to the deleterious effects linked to drug administration, particularly at higher dosage. The impaired renal function often associated with this treatment is not extensively explored and could deserve more specific studies. Several questions remain to be answered about the best diuretic modality administration, global clinical impact during acute and post-discharge period, and the role of renal function deterioration during treatment. Thus, if loop diuretics are a necessary part of the treatment for acute heart failure, then there must be an approach that allows personalization of therapy for optimal benefit and avoidance of adverse events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Master 17 11%
Other 16 10%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#393,653
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#209
of 6,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,210
of 397,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.