↓ Skip to main content

The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1360 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1256 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

John B Sexton, Robert L Helmreich, Torsten B Neilands, Kathy Rowan, Keryn Vella, James Boyden, Peter R Roberts, Eric J Thomas

Abstract

There is widespread interest in measuring healthcare provider attitudes about issues relevant to patient safety (often called safety climate or safety culture). Here we report the psychometric properties, establish benchmarking data, and discuss emerging areas of research with the University of Texas Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
Malaysia 8 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 1213 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 180 14%
Student > Master 179 14%
Researcher 119 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 89 7%
Student > Postgraduate 81 6%
Other 304 24%
Unknown 304 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 330 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 174 14%
Social Sciences 82 7%
Psychology 69 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 65 5%
Other 174 14%
Unknown 362 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,070,887
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#753
of 8,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,183
of 169,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.