↓ Skip to main content

Periosteal nerve blocks for distal radius and ulna fracture manipulation—the technique and early results

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Periosteal nerve blocks for distal radius and ulna fracture manipulation—the technique and early results
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0277-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Elhosseini Tageldin, Mamun Alrashid, Al-Achraf Khoriati, Srinivas Gadikoppula, Henry Dushan Atkinson

Abstract

We present a pilot series of patients with distal forearm fractures manipulated following a proximal periosteal nerve block with local anaesthesia. This is a novel technique which can be utilised in adults and children and is described herein. With a median of 40 years (range 10-81 years), 42 patients (16 children) with distal radial and ulnar fractures were included. Of these patients, 40 underwent periosteal blocks in the emergency room or fracture clinic; 2 were already inpatients. Fractures were manipulated routinely and immobilised with plaster. Mobile fluoroscopy was not used for patients in the emergency department or fracture clinic. Of the 42 patients, 40 patients (95 %) had successful fracture manipulation and did not require subsequent treatment. Two patients (5 %) needed subsequent surgery, one for K-wire stabilisation of their fracture and the second for volar plate fixation. The procedure was described as painless in 35 (83 %) patients (visual analogue scale/VAS score 0), with 6 (14 %) suffering minimal pain (VAS 1-3). In the 12-16-year age group, 15 patients (94 %) described the manipulation as painless; 1 patient described the procedure as minimally painful. No additional analgesia of any kind was given. There were no direct complications from any of the periosteal nerve blocks. Local anaesthetic periosteal nerve blocks injected proximally to the fracture sites are a simple and yet very effective new technique which provide good/excellent analgesia and facilitate the reduction of distal radial and ulnar fractures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 20 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,345,593
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#646
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,690
of 267,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.