↓ Skip to main content

Silver nanoparticle protein corona and toxicity: a mini-review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Silver nanoparticle protein corona and toxicity: a mini-review
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12951-015-0114-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nelson Durán, Camila P. Silveira, Marcela Durán, Diego Stéfani T. Martinez

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles are one of the most important materials in the nanotechnology industry. Additionally, the protein corona is emerging as a key entity at the nanobiointerface; thus, a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between proteins and silver nanoparticles is imperative. Therefore, literature reporting studies involving both single molecule protein coronas (i.e., bovine and human serum albumin, tubulin, ubiquitin and hyaluronic-binding protein) and complex protein coronas (i.e., fetal bovine serum and yeast extract proteins) were selected to demonstrate the effects of protein coronas on silver nanoparticle cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity. There is evidence that distinct and differential protein components may yield a "protein corona signature" that is related to the size and/or surface curvature of the silver nanoparticles. Therefore, the formation of silver nanoparticle protein coronas together with the biological response to these coronas (i.e., oxidative stress, inflammation and cytotoxicity) as well as other cellular biophysicochemical mechanisms (i.e., endocytosis, biotransformation and biodistribution) will be important for nanomedicine and nanotoxicology. Researchers may benefit from the information contained herein to improve biotechnological applications of silver nanoparticles and to address related safety concerns. In summary, the main aim of this mini-review is to highlight the relationship between the formation of silver nanoparticle protein coronas and toxicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 385 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 24%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Master 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 81 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 56 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 13%
Materials Science 25 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 6%
Other 77 20%
Unknown 107 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,916,068
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#167
of 1,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,494
of 268,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,536 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.