↓ Skip to main content

A study of the immediate effects of glycerine‐filled insoles, contoured prefabricated orthoses and flat insoles on single‐leg balance, gait patterns and perceived comfort in healthy adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A study of the immediate effects of glycerine‐filled insoles, contoured prefabricated orthoses and flat insoles on single‐leg balance, gait patterns and perceived comfort in healthy adults
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13047-015-0107-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna L. Hatton, François Hug, Brooke C. M. Brown, Leon P. Green, Jacob R. Hughes, Jarrad King, Emma J. Orgar, Kate Surman, Bill Vicenzino

Abstract

Footwear interventions are often prescribed to assist with the management of lower limb pain, injury and disease. Commercially available shoe insoles and orthoses are increasingly incorporating novel design features to alleviate foot and lower limb symptoms, but this may be at a cost to optimal functional performance. This study compared the immediate effects of wearing glycerine-filled insoles, contoured prefabricated orthoses, and flat insoles, on balance and gait measures. Thirty healthy adults (17 men, 13 women; mean [SD] age: 24.3 [2.5] years) performed tests of single-leg standing with eyes open (Kistler force platform), star excursion balance test, and level-ground walking (GAITRite® walkway system), under three randomised conditions: wearing glycerine-filled insoles, prefabricated orthoses, and flat (control) insoles, within their own footwear. Centre of pressure movement (anterior-posterior and mediolateral range and standard deviation, total path velocity), star excursion balance test reach distance, and temporospatial gait variables were collected. Perceived comfort of the inserts was scored immediately after use on a 100 mm visual analogue rating scale. After trialling all inserts each participant ranked their level of comfort from least to most. Centre of pressure measures, star excursion balance test reach distance, or temporospatial gait variables did not differ between the three inserts (all P values >0.088). Significant between-condition differences were reported for comfort ranking (P = 0.031), but not rating scores (P = 0.638). Weak to moderate negative correlations (r values ranged between -0.368 and -0.406) were observed between visual analogue scale comfort rating for the flat insoles and prefabricated orthoses, star excursion balance test and gait measures. Single-leg standing balance, star excursion balance test performance, and level-ground walking patterns in asymptomatic adults do not appear to differ when wearing glycerine-filled insoles, contoured prefabricated orthoses, or flat insoles. Perceived comfort may be related to the biomechanical or clinical effectiveness of novel footwear interventions, and requires further investigation. Importantly, these findings are specific to a healthy population and further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of glycerine-filled insoles in patients with known balance impairments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Engineering 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Sports and Recreations 10 12%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 25 30%