↓ Skip to main content

AGuIX nanoparticles as a promising platform for image-guided radiation therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Nanotechnology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 186)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AGuIX nanoparticles as a promising platform for image-guided radiation therapy
Published in
Cancer Nanotechnology, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12645-015-0012-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Detappe, Sijumon Kunjachan, Joerg Rottmann, James Robar, Panagiotis Tsiamas, Houari Korideck, Olivier Tillement, Ross Berbeco

Abstract

AGuIX are gadolinium-based nanoparticles developed mainly for imaging due to their MR contrast properties. They also have a potential role in radiation therapy as a radiosensitizer. We used MRI to quantify the uptake of AGuIX in pancreatic cancer cells, and TEM for intracellular localization. We measured the radiosensitization of a pancreatic cancer cell line in a low-energy (220 kVp) beam, a standard 6 MV beam (STD) and a flattening filter free 6 MV beam (FFF). We demonstrated that the presence of nanoparticles significantly decreases cell survival when combined with an X-ray beam with a large proportion of low-energy photons (close to the k-edge of the nanoparticles). The concentration of nanoparticles in the cell achieves its highest level after 15 min and then reaches a plateau. The accumulated nanoparticles are mainly localized in the cytoplasm, inside vesicles. We found that the 6 MV FFF beams offer the best trade-off between penetration depth and proportion of low-energy photons. At 10 cm depth, we measured a DEF20 % of 1.30 ± 0.47 for the 6 MV FFF beam, compared to 1.23 ± 0.26 for the 6 MV STD beam. Additional measurements with un-incubated nanoparticles provide evidence that chemical processes might also be contributing to the dose enhancement effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 26%
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Chemistry 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,352,719
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Nanotechnology
#27
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,970
of 268,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Nanotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them