↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1385-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erinija Pranckevičiene, Tautvydas Rančelis, Aidas Pranculis, Vaidutis Kučinskas

Abstract

Every next generation sequencing (NGS) platform relies on proprietary and open source computational tools to analyze sequencing data. NGS tools for Illumina platforms are well documented which is not the case with AB SOLiD systems. We applied several computational and variant calling pipelines to analyse targeted exome sequencing data obtained using AB SOLiD 5500 system. Our investigated tools comprised proprietary LifeScope's pipeline in combination with open source color-space competent mapping programs and a variant caller. We present instrumental details of the pipelines that were used and quantitative comparative analysis of variant lists generated by LifeScope's pipeline versus open source tools. Sufficient coverage of targeted regions was achieved by all investigated pipelines. High variability was observed in identities of variants across the mapping programs. We observed less than 50 % concordance of variant lists produced by approaches based on different mapping algorithms. We summarized different approaches with regards to coverage (DP) and quality (QUAL) properties of the variants provided by GATK and found that LifeScope's computational pipeline is superior. Fusion of information on mapping profiles (pileup) at genomic positions of variants in several different alignments proved to be a useful strategy to assess questionable singleton variants. We quantitatively supported a conclusion that Lifescope's pipeline is superior for processing sequencing data obtained by AB SOLiD 5500 system. Nevertheless the use of alternative pipelines is encouraged because aggregation of information from other mapping and variant calling approaches helps to resolve questionable calls and increases the confidence of the call. It was noted that a coverage threshold for variant to be considered for further analysis has to be chosen in data-driven way to prevent a loss of important information.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%