You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Working alliance, interpersonal trust and perceived coercion in mental health review hearings
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-5-29 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vidis Donnelly, Aideen Lynch, Damian Mohan, Harry G Kennedy |
Abstract |
There is some evidence that when mental health commitment hearings are held in accordance with therapeutic jurisprudence principles they are perceived as less coercive, and more just in their procedures leading to improved treatment adherence and fewer hospital readmissions. This suggests an effect of the hearing on therapeutic relationships. We compared working alliance and interpersonal trust in clinicians and forensic patients, whose continued detentions were reviewed by two different legal review bodies according to their legal category. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 14 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2012.
All research outputs
#14,139,782
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#492
of 714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,234
of 142,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.