↓ Skip to main content

Nebulised hypertonic saline (3 %) among children with mild to moderately severe bronchiolitis - a double blind randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nebulised hypertonic saline (3 %) among children with mild to moderately severe bronchiolitis - a double blind randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12887-015-0434-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aayush Khanal, Arun Sharma, Srijana Basnet, Pushpa Raj Sharma, Fakir Chandra Gami

Abstract

To Assess the efficacy of nebulised hypertonic saline (HS) (3 %) among children with mild to moderately severe bronchiolitis. Infants aged 6 weeks to 24 months, with a first episode of wheezing and Clinical Severity scores (Arch Dis Child 67:289-93, 1992) between 1 and 8, were enrolled over 4 months duration. Those with severe disease, co-morbidities, prior wheezing, recent bronchodilator and steroid use were excluded. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion, to receive two doses of nebulized 3 % HS (Group 1) or 0.9 % normal saline (Group 2) with 1.5 mg of L-Epineprine, delivered 30 min apart. Parents were contacted at 24 h and 7 days. The principal outcome measure was the mean change in clinical severity score at the end of 2 h of observation. A total of 100 infants (mean age 9.6 months, range 2-23 months; 61 % males) were enrolled. Patients in both groups had mild to moderately severe disease at presentation. On an intention-to-treat basis, the infants in the HS group had a significant reduction (3.57 ± 1.41) in the mean clinical severity score compared to those in the NS group (2.26 ± 1.15); [p < 0.001; CI: 0.78-1.82]. More children in the HS group (n = 35/50; 70.0 %) were eligible for ER/OPD discharge at the end of 2 h than those in the NS group (n = 15/50; 30 %; p < 0.001), and less likely to need a hospital re-visit (n = 5/50; 10.0 %) in the next 24 h as compared to the NS group (n = 15/50, 30.0 %; p < 0.001). The treatment was well tolerated, with no adverse effects. Nebulized 3 % HS is effective, safe and superior to normal saline for outpatient management of infants with mild to moderately severe viral bronchiolitis in improving Clinical Severity Scores, facilitating early Out-Patient Department discharge and preventing hospital re-visits and admissions in the 24 h of presentation. Clinicaltrials.gov NCTID012766821 . Registered on January 12, 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,815,450
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#628
of 3,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,847
of 267,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#8
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.