↓ Skip to main content

Does fentanyl or remifentanil provide better postoperative recovery after laparoscopic surgery? a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does fentanyl or remifentanil provide better postoperative recovery after laparoscopic surgery? a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12871-018-0547-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayako Asakura, Takahiro Mihara, Takahisa Goto

Abstract

Fentanyl and remifentanil are widely used opioids in surgery, but it has not been evaluated whether the choice of opioids during surgery affects the patients' postoperative quality of recovery. Accordingly, we aim to compare postoperative recovery of fentanyl-based anesthesia with remifentanil-based anesthesia after laparoscopic surgery using the QoR 40 questionnaire (QoR-40). The study was prospective, randomized, patient and investigator-blinded, controlled, clinical trial. Seventy patients undergoing laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic renal or ureteral surgery were recruited and randomized to either fentanyl or remifentanil based anesthesia groups. The primary outcome was the global QoR-40 at 24 h after surgery. The global median (interquartile range) QoR-40 score was 160 (138-177) in the fentanyl group (n = 32) and 140 (127-166) in the remifentanil group (n = 31). Physical comfort and physical independence, the two out of the five dimensions of the QoR-40, demonstrated significantly high scores in the fentanyl group (P = 0.047 and P = 0.032, respectively). Although the global QoR is higher in the fentanyl group by 20 points compared with remifentanil group, no significant differences revealed between the groups. Further studies with large numbers of subjects of the same gender are needed. University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN),  UMIN000010464 . Registered 10 April 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 21 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Engineering 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 18 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#1,196
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,266
of 326,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#45
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.