You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Small doses of epinephrine prolong the recovery from a rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-018-0544-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hubert J. Schmitt |
| Abstract |
During anaesthesia it is not uncommon to administer epinephrine in patients blocked by non-depolarizing muscle relaxants. However, there are few reports on possible interaction of epinephrine with neuromuscular transmission in humans. An otherwise healthy 74-yr-old man underwent transurethral resection of a benign prostatic hyperplasia under total intravenous anaesthesia. Because of repeated drop in heart rate and blood pressure the patient received in total three bolus of epinephrine 5 μg, respectively. Each time this small dose of epinephrine intensified a rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block verified by acceleromygraphy. Further anaesthetic course was uneventful. In this case reported here small doses of intravenously administered epinephrine markedly prolonged a rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Given the widely used co-administration of epinephrine and muscle relaxants possible adrenergic interference with neuromuscular transmission would have implications for daily anaesthetic practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#1,196
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,266
of 326,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#45
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.