↓ Skip to main content

International practices in the dietary management of fructose 1-6 biphosphatase deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International practices in the dietary management of fructose 1-6 biphosphatase deficiency
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13023-018-0760-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Pinto, M. Alfadhel, R. Akroyd, Y. Atik Altınok, S. M. Bernabei, L. Bernstein, G. Bruni, G. Caine, E. Cameron, R. Carruthers, B. Cochrane, A. Daly, F. de Boer, S. Delaunay, A. Dianin, M. Dixon, E. Drogari, S. Dubois, S. Evans, J. Gribben, G. Gugelmo, C. Heidenborg, I. Hunjan, I. L. Kok, B. Kumru, A. Liguori, D. Mayr, E. Megdad, U. Meyer, R. B. Oliveira, A. Pal, A. Pozzoli, R. Pretese, J. C. Rocha, S. Rosenbaum-Fabian, J. Serrano-Nieto, E. Sjoqvist, C. Timmer, L. White, T. van den Hurk, M. van Rijn, H. Zweers, M. Ziadlou, A. MacDonald

Abstract

In fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase (FBPase) deficiency, management aims to prevent hypoglycaemia and lactic acidosis by avoiding prolonged fasting, particularly during febrile illness. Although the need for an emergency regimen to avoid metabolic decompensation is well established at times of illness, there is uncertainty about the need for other dietary management strategies such as sucrose or fructose restriction. We assessed international differences in the dietary management of FBPase deficiency. A cross-sectional questionnaire (13 questions) was emailed to all members of the Society for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (SSIEM) and a wide database of inherited metabolic disorder dietitians. Thirty-six centres reported the dietary prescriptions of 126 patients with FBPase deficiency. Patients' age at questionnaire completion was: 1-10y, 46% (n = 58), 11-16y, 21% (n = 27), and >16y, 33% (n = 41). Diagnostic age was: <1y, 36% (n = 46); 1-10y, 59% (n = 74); 11-16y, 3% (n = 4); and >16y, 2% (n = 2). Seventy-five per cent of centres advocated dietary restrictions. This included restriction of: high sucrose foods only (n = 7 centres, 19%); fruit and sugary foods (n = 4, 11%); fruit, vegetables and sugary foods (n = 13, 36%). Twenty-five per cent of centres (n = 9), advised no dietary restrictions when patients were well. A higher percentage of patients aged >16y rather than ≤16y were prescribed dietary restrictions: patients aged 1-10y, 67% (n = 39/58), 11-16y, 63% (n = 17/27) and >16y, 85% (n = 35/41). Patients classified as having a normal fasting tolerance increased with age from 30% in 1-10y, to 36% in 11-16y, and 58% in >16y, but it was unclear if fasting tolerance was biochemically proven. Twenty centres (56%) routinely prescribed uncooked cornstarch (UCCS) to limit overnight fasting in 47 patients regardless of their actual fasting tolerance (37%). All centres advocated an emergency regimen mainly based on glucose polymer for illness management. Although all patients were prescribed an emergency regimen for illness, use of sucrose and fructose restricted diets with UCCS supplementation varied widely. Restrictions did not relax with age. International guidelines are necessary to help direct future dietary management of FBPase deficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 39%