You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why California retailers stop selling tobacco products, and what their customers and employees think about it when they do: case studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-848 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patricia A McDaniel, Ruth E Malone |
Abstract |
In California, some 40,000 retailers sell tobacco products. Tobacco's ubiquitousness in retail settings normalizes use and cues smoking urges among former smokers and those attempting cessation. Thus, limiting the number of retailers is regarded as key to ending the tobacco epidemic. In the past decade, independent pharmacies and local grocery chains in California and elsewhere have voluntarily abandoned tobacco sales. No previous studies have examined the reasons for this emerging phenomenon. We sought to learn what motivated retailers to discontinue tobacco sales and what employees and customers thought about their decision. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
New Zealand | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
Researcher | 11 | 17% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 11 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 5 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,895,951
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,220
of 17,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,274
of 156,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#16
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.