↓ Skip to main content

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of yoruba version of the short-form 36 health survey

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 2,191)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of yoruba version of the short-form 36 health survey
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12955-015-0337-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chidozie Emmanuel Mbada, Gafar Atanda Adeogun, Michael Opeoluwa Ogunlana, Rufus Adesoji Adedoyin, Adesanmi Akinsulore, Taofeek Oluwole Awotidebe, Opeyemi Ayodiipo Idowu, Olumide Ayoola Olaoye

Abstract

The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a valid quality of life tool often employed to determine the impact of medical intervention and the outcome of health care services. However, the SF-36 is culturally sensitive which necessitates its adaptation and translation into different languages. This study was conducted to cross-culturally adapt the SF-36 into Yoruba language and determine its reliability and validity. Based on the International Quality of Life Assessment project guidelines, a sequence of translation, test of item-scale correlation, and validation was implemented for the translation of the Yoruba version of the SF-36. Following pilot testing, the English and the Yoruba versions of the SF-36 were administered to a random sample of 1087 apparently healthy individuals to test validity and 249 respondents completed the Yoruba SF-36 again after two weeks to test reliability. Data was analyzed using Pearson's product moment correlation analysis, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, multi trait scaling analysis and Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) at p < 0.05. The concurrent validity scores for scales and domains ranges between 0.749 and 0.902 with the highest and lowest scores in the General Health (0.902) and Bodily Pain (0.749) scale. Scale-level descriptive result showed that all scale and domain scores had negative skewness ranging from -2.08 to -0.98. The mean scores for each scales ranges between 83.2 and 88.8. The domain scores for Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component were 85.6 ± 13.7 and 85.9 ± 15.4 respectively. The convergent validity was satisfactory, ranging from 0.421 to 0.907. Discriminant validity was also satisfactory except for item '1'. The ICC for the test-retest reliability of the Yoruba SF-36 ranges between 0.636 and 0.843 for scales; and 0.783 and 0.851 for domains. The data quality, concurrent and discriminant validity, reliability and internal consistency of the Yoruba version of the SF-36 are adequate and it is recommended for measuring health-related quality of life among Yoruba population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#952,771
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#35
of 2,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,359
of 269,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.