You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomized controlled proof-of-concept trial of early sedation management using Responsiveness Index monitoring in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-1043-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Kaila, Kirsty Everingham, Petteri Lapinlampi, Petra Peltola, Mika O K Särkelä, Kimmo Uutela, Timothy S. Walsh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 26% |
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,019,547
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,806
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,669
of 398,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#130
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.