↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary evaluation of the reliability, validity and feasibility of the arm activity measure – Thai version (ArmA-TH) in cerebrovascular patients with upper limb hemiplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preliminary evaluation of the reliability, validity and feasibility of the arm activity measure – Thai version (ArmA-TH) in cerebrovascular patients with upper limb hemiplegia
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12955-018-0971-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Montana Buntragulpoontawee, Patreeya Euawongyarti, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Stephen Ashford, Somprartthana Rattanamanee, Jeeranan Khunachiva

Abstract

Upper limb hemiplegia following cerebrovascular diseases can result in significant functional limitation. To assess such functional disturbance requires a comprehensive, valid and reliable tool. The Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a comprehensive, valid and reliable self-report questionnaire to assess real-life function for upper limb hemiplegia. However, it has never been translated for use in different languages. The purpose of this study is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) questionnaire into a Thai version and to evaluate content validity, internal consistency and feasibility. The ArmA was translated and culturally adapted according to published cross-cultural adaptation guidelines resulting in the Thai version of ArmA (ArmA-TH). Forty Thai patients with upper limb hemiplegia resulting from cerebrovascular disorders participated in field-testing of the ArmA-TH. Its feasibility was evaluated. Content validity index for item (I-CVI) and score (S-CVI) were examined. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated by Gwet's AC2. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Forty patients (29 males, 11 females) with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or TBI were included. The average age of patients was 54.5 years (SD 15.0). Twenty-seven patients (67.5%) completed the questionnaire within 5 min or less, average time taken was 4.45 (1.73) min. For both subscales, patients reported the ArmA-TH to be relevant (85%) and easy to use (67.5%). More than 80% of patients found the passive subscale useful, almost 80% found the active subscale useful. Overall S-CVI was 0.83, S-CVI for passive and active function subscale was 0.79 and 0.86 respectively. The inter-rater reliability coefficients for ArmA-TH was 0.81. Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 for the overall ArmA, 0.89 and 0.88 for the passive and active function subscales. The ArmA-TH was a feasible self-report questionnaire to assess hemiplegic upper limb function with good content validity, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 19%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 23%
Psychology 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,662,493
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#330
of 2,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,735
of 326,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#26
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.