You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maximising response from GPs to questionnaire surveys: do length or incentives make a difference?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-15-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Cottrell, Edward Roddy, Trishna Rathod, Elaine Thomas, Mark Porcheret, Nadine E Foster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,923,197
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#621
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,641
of 352,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.