↓ Skip to main content

Injuries in girls’ soccer and basketball: a comparison of high schools with and without athletic trainers

Overview of attention for article published in Injury Epidemiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 414)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
363 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Injuries in girls’ soccer and basketball: a comparison of high schools with and without athletic trainers
Published in
Injury Epidemiology, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40621-018-0159-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren A. Pierpoint, Cynthia R. LaBella, Christy L. Collins, Sarah K. Fields, R. Dawn Comstock

Abstract

Sports injuries impose physical and economic burdens on high school athletes, yet only 37% of high schools have access to a fulltime certified athletic trainer (AT). Although intuitively there are multiple benefits of AT coverage, research demonstrating the measurable effect of AT coverage on rates and patterns of injury is limited. Our objective was to investigate the epidemiology of girls' basketball and soccer injuries in high schools with and without an AT. We compared data captured by two similar sports injury surveillance systems during the 2006/07-2008/09 academic years. High School Reporting Information Online (RIO) included a national sample of schools with ATs, and the Sports Injury Surveillance System (SISS) included a sample of Chicago public high schools without ATs. Overall injury rates were higher in schools without ATs than schools with ATs in girls' soccer (RR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.51-2.00) and basketball (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.45). Recurrent injury rates were even higher in schools without ATs compared to schools with ATs in soccer (RR: 6.00 95% CI: 4.54-7.91) and basketball (RR: 2.99, 95% CI: 2.12-4.14). Conversely, concussion rates were higher in schools with ATs than schools without ATs in soccer (RR: 8.05, 95% CI: 2.00-32.51) and basketball (RR: 4.50, 95% CI: 1.43-14.16). Other injury patterns were similar between the two samples. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of AT coverage of high school girls' soccer and basketball, both in reducing overall and recurrent injury rates and in identifying athletes with concussions. Future studies should evaluate the effect of ATs on other high school sports and on youth sports to determine if these findings are generalizable across sports and age groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 363 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 18 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 29 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 356. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#91,865
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Injury Epidemiology
#13
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,935
of 340,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Injury Epidemiology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them