↓ Skip to main content

Germline and somatic variations influence the somatic mutational signatures of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas in a Chinese population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Germline and somatic variations influence the somatic mutational signatures of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas in a Chinese population
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-4906-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jintao Guo, Jiankun Huang, Ying Zhou, Yulin Zhou, Liying Yu, Huili Li, Lingyun Hou, Liuwei Zhu, Dandan Ge, Yuanyuan Zeng, Bayasi Guleng, Qiyuan Li

Abstract

Esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) is the fourth most lethal cancer in China. Previous studies reveal several highly conserved mutational processes in ESCC. However, it remains unclear what are the true regulators of the mutational processes. We analyzed the somatic mutational signatures in 302 paired whole-exome sequencing data of ESCC in a Chinese population for potential regulators of the mutational processes. We identified three conserved subtypes based on the mutational signatures with significantly different clinical outcomes. Our results show that patients of different subpopulations of Chinese differ significantly in the activity of the "NpCpG" signature (FDR = 0.00188). In addition, we report ZNF750 and CDC27, of which the somatic statuses and the genetic burdens consistently influence the activities of specific mutational signatures in ESCC: the somatic ZNF750 status is associated with the AID/APOBEC-related mutational process (FDR = 0.0637); the somatic CDC27 copy-number is associated with the "NpCpG" (FDR = 0.00615) and the AID/APOBEC-related mutational processes (FDR = 8.69 × 10- 4). The burdens of germline variants in the two genes also significantly influence the activities of the same somatic mutational signatures (FDR < 0.1). We report multiple factors that influence the mutational processes in ESCC including: the subpopulations of Chinese; the germline and somatic statuses of ZNF750 and CDC27 and exposure to alcohol and tobacco. Our findings based on the evidences from both germline and somatic levels reveal potential genetic regulators of the somatic mutational processes and provide insights into the biology of esophageal carcinogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,722
of 10,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,432
of 326,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#108
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.