↓ Skip to main content

An implantable pump Lenus pro® in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with intravenous treprostinil

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An implantable pump Lenus pro® in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with intravenous treprostinil
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12890-017-0474-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcin Kurzyna, Katarzyna Małaczyńska-Rajpold, Andrzej Koteja, Agnieszka Pawlak, Łukasz Chrzanowski, Michał Furdal, Zbigniew Gąsior, Wojciech Jacheć, Bożena Sobkowicz, Justyna Norwa, Tatiana Mularek-Kubzdela, Adam Torbicki

Abstract

Subcutaneous treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Due to local pain it can cause a deterioration of heart related quality of life (HRQoL) or even abandonment of treatment. The aim of this paper was to assess the feasibility of treatment with intravenous treprostinil administered by means of the Lenus Pro® implantable pump. This was a retrospective, multi-center study involving 12 patients (8 females) with PAH treated with a subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil with intolerable pain at the infusion site. Clinical evaluation, including HRQoL assessment with SF-36 questionnaire was performed, before pump implantation and 2-9 months after. The median time of follow-up time was 14 months (4-29 months). After implantation of the Lenus Pro® pump, no statistically significant changes were observed in the 6-min walking distance and NT-proBNP. After implantation 50% of patients were in II WHO functional class (33% before, p = 0,59). There was a significant improvement in HRQoL within the Physical Component Score (28 ± 7 vs 38 ± 8 pts., p < 0,001) and in specific domains of SF-36 form: physical role (31 ± 7 pts. vs. 41 ± 12 pts., p = 0,03), bodily pain (31 ± 12 vs. 50 ± 14 pts., p = 0,02), and vitality (37 ± 8 pts. vs. 50 ± 14 pts., p = 0,03). During the periprocedural period, one patient developed a recurrent haematoma at the implantation site. During follow-up in one patient, the drug delivering cannula slipped out of the subclavian vein, what required repositioning repeated twice, and in another patient an unexpected increase in the drug administration rate was observed. In patients with PAH who do not tolerate subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil, the use of the Lenus Pro® implantable pump results in significant subjective improvement of vitality and physical aspect of the HRQoL with acceptable safety profile.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 24 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 28 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,516,749
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#483
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,490
of 438,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#23
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.