↓ Skip to main content

Abrasion arthroplasty increases mesenchymal stem cell content of postoperative joint effusions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abrasion arthroplasty increases mesenchymal stem cell content of postoperative joint effusions
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12891-015-0705-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rainer Beckmann, Sebastian Lippross, Claudia Hartz, Mersedeh Tohidnezhad, Mónica S. Ventura Ferreira, Sabine Neuss-Stein, Andreas Seekamp, Sven Nebelung, Nisreen Kweider, Björn Rath, Holger Jahr, Thomas Pufe, Deike J. Varoga

Abstract

Abrasion arthroplasty (AAP) is a procedure by which intrinsic cartilage healing is believed to be stimulated. Although clinically accepted for degenerative and traumatic cartilage lesions scientific evidence at a molecular level that proves the effect of AAP is scarce. Mononuclear cells were extracted from postoperative joint effusions 21.5 h post AAP and simple debridement of cartilage lesions. Luminex, ELISA and FACS experiments were performed. Immunohistochemical stainings of cell cultures for cartilage markers were used to confirm the findings. Postoperative joint effusions after AAP showed increased contents of Mononuclear cells compared to Arthroscopic Chondroplasty (ACP). BMP-4 and IGF were increased in AAP as complared to ACP. Mononuclear cells isolated after AAP express the MSC markers CD 73, CD 105, CD 90, CD 44 and are CD34 negative. Chondrogenic differentiation was demonstrated by positive staining for Sox9, collagen II, proteoglycan, chondroitin-4-sulfate. Our results support the clinical application of AAP as a procedure that enhances cartilage repair as an alternative to far more complex procedures that have gained popularity. Furthermore the data presented supports clinical investigations that recommend not to use suction drainage as by this procedure a considerable amount of the regeneratory potential of postoperative joint effusions might be extracted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,346,908
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,457
of 4,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,952
of 267,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#62
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.