↓ Skip to main content

A labelled discrete choice experiment adds realism to the choices presented: preferences for surveillance tests for Barrett esophagus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A labelled discrete choice experiment adds realism to the choices presented: preferences for surveillance tests for Barrett esophagus
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-9-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle E Kruijshaar, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Bas Donkers, Caspar WN Looman, Peter D Siersema, Ewout W Steyerberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
France 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,573,552
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,108
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,106
of 97,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.