You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Screen or not to screen for peripheral arterial disease: guidance from a decision model
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-89 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anil Vaidya, Manuela A Joore, Arina J ten Cate-Hoek, Hugo ten Cate, Johan L Severens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 29% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,573,552
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,009
of 15,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,681
of 309,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#142
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.