You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tailoring intervention procedures to routine primary health care practice; an ethnographic process evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-7-125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yvonne JFM Jansen, Antoinette de Bont, Marleen Foets, Marc Bruijnzeels, Roland Bal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,126,698
of 24,375,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,039
of 8,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,642
of 69,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,375,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.