↓ Skip to main content

GC/MS-based urine metabolomics analysis of renal allograft recipients with acute rejection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GC/MS-based urine metabolomics analysis of renal allograft recipients with acute rejection
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12967-018-1584-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Long Zheng, Jina Wang, Wenjun Gao, Chao Hu, Shuo Wang, Ruiming Rong, Yinlong Guo, Tongyu Zhu, Dong Zhu

Abstract

Acute renal allograft rejection is a common complication after renal transplantation that often leads to chronic rejection and ultimate graft loss. While renal allograft biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of acute rejection, the possibility of biopsy-associated complications cannot be overlooked. The development of noninvasive methods for accurate detection of acute renal allograft rejection is thus of significant clinical importance. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was employed for analysis of urine metabolites in 15 renal allograft recipients with acute rejection and 15 stable renal transplant recipients. Partial least squares (PLS) regression and leave-one-out analyses were performed to ascertain whether the metabolites identified could be exploited to distinguish acute rejection from stable groups as well as their sensitivity and specificity. Overall, 14 metabolites were significantly altered in the acute rejection group (11 and 3 metabolites displayed higher and lower levels, respectively) relative to the stable transplant group. Data from PLS and leave-one-out analyses revealed that the differential metabolites identified not only distinguished acute rejection from stable transplant recipients but also showed high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of renal allograft recipients with acute rejection. Urine metabolites identified with GC/MS can effectively distinguish acute rejection from stable transplant recipients, supporting the potential utility of metabolome analysis in non-invasive diagnosis of acute rejection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Unknown 11 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,288,776
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#954
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,539
of 329,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#16
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.