↓ Skip to main content

Fruit and vegetables intake among elderly Iranians: a theory-based interventional study using the five-a-day program

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fruit and vegetables intake among elderly Iranians: a theory-based interventional study using the five-a-day program
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leili Salehi, Kazem Mohammad, Ali Montazeri

Abstract

The benefit of FV intake in old age is well documented. However, there is evidence that old people do not consume enough FV. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored nutrition intervention that aimed to increase the FV intake among elderly Iranians aged 60 and over.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 7 7%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2011.
All research outputs
#5,414,361
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#774
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,103
of 141,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#18
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.