You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A rapid, simple method for the genetic discrimination of intact Arabidopsis thaliana mutant seeds using metabolic profiling by direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-7-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suk Weon Kim, Hye Jin Kim, Jong Hyun Kim, Yong Kook Kwon, Myung Suk Ahn, Young Pyo Jang, Jang R Liu |
Abstract |
Efficient high throughput screening systems of useful mutants are prerequisite for study of plant functional genomics and lots of application fields. Advance in such screening tools, thanks to the development of analytic instruments. Direct analysis in real-time (DART)-mass spectrometry (MS) by ionization of complex materials at atmospheric pressure is a rapid, simple, high-resolution analytical technique. Here we describe a rapid, simple method for the genetic discrimination of intact Arabidopsis thaliana mutant seeds using metabolic profiling by DART-MS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 2% |
Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 28% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 53% |
Chemistry | 7 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,357,126
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#625
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,169
of 112,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.