↓ Skip to main content

The association between obstructive sleep apnea and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between obstructive sleep apnea and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12890-015-0102-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaoyong Xu, Yi Wan, Ming Xu, Jie Ming, Ying Xing, Fei An, Qiuhe Ji

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repeated episodes of obstruction of the upper airway. Numerous studies have indicated a relationship between OSA and metabolic syndrome (MS), but the results remain debatable. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between OSA and MS. We searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and ISO Web of Knowledge) up to September 2014 with English-language restriction. Cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies in which the presence of OSA was assessed by objective measurements, the exposure of interest was OSA, and the outcome of interest was the presence (or incidence) of MS were included. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (or relative risk) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled. Sensitivity analyses were conducted, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Overall, 15 cross-sectional (2456 patients with OSA and 1705 subjects without OSA), five case-control (1156 OSA patients and 404 controls), and no cohort studies were included. The pooled ORs of MS in individuals with OSA for cross-sectional and case-control studies were 2.87 (95 % CI: 2.41-3.42) and 2.56 (95 % CI: 1.98-3.31), respectively. There was clinically unimportant (I (2)  = 20 %) and moderate (I (2)  = 35 %) between-study heterogeneity of the analysis. The pooled crude ORs of MS in individuals with mild and moderate-to-severe OSA was 2.39 (95 % CI: 1.65-3.46) and 3.45 (95 % CI: 2.33-5.12), respectively, and there was substantial heterogeneity in the meta-analyses (I (2)  = 53 % and I (2)  = 63 %, respectively). However, no evidence of publication bias was detected. OSA is shown to be associated with MS, although causality between these two factors has not been demonstrated yet. Future cohort and randomized controlled studies are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 12 9%
Other 35 27%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,005,966
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#98
of 2,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,840
of 286,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.