↓ Skip to main content

The Toronto Cognitive Assessment (TorCA): normative data and validation to detect amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Toronto Cognitive Assessment (TorCA): normative data and validation to detect amnestic mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13195-018-0382-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morris Freedman, Larry Leach, M. Carmela Tartaglia, Kathryn A. Stokes, Yael Goldberg, Robyn Spring, Nima Nourhaghighi, Tom Gee, Stephen C. Strother, Mohammad O. Alhaj, Michael Borrie, Sultan Darvesh, Alita Fernandez, Corinne E. Fischer, Jennifer Fogarty, Barry D. Greenberg, Michelle Gyenes, Nathan Herrmann, Ron Keren, Josh Kirstein, Sanjeev Kumar, Benjamin Lam, Suvendrini Lena, Mary Pat McAndrews, Gary Naglie, Robert Partridge, Tarek K. Rajji, William Reichmann, M. Uri Wolf, Nicolaas P. L. G. Verhoeff, Jordana L. Waserman, Sandra E. Black, David F. Tang-Wai

Abstract

A need exists for easily administered assessment tools to detect mild cognitive changes that are more comprehensive than screening tests but shorter than a neuropsychological battery and that can be administered by physicians, as well as any health care professional or trained assistant in any medical setting. The Toronto Cognitive Assessment (TorCA) was developed to achieve these goals. We obtained normative data on the TorCA (n = 303), determined test reliability, developed an iPad version, and validated the TorCA against neuropsychological assessment for detecting amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) (n = 50/57, aMCI/normal cognition). For the normative study, healthy volunteers were recruited from the Rotman Research Institute registry. For the validation study, the sample was comprised of participants with aMCI or normal cognition based on neuropsychological assessment. Cognitively normal participants were recruited from both healthy volunteers in the normative study sample and the community. The TorCA provides a stable assessment of multiple cognitive domains. The total score correctly classified 79% of participants (sensitivity 80%; specificity 79%). In an exploratory logistic regression analysis, indices of Immediate Verbal Recall, Delayed Verbal and Visual Recall, Visuospatial Function, and Working Memory/Attention/Executive Control, a subset of the domains assessed by the TorCA, correctly classified 92% of participants (sensitivity 92%; specificity 91%). Paper and iPad version scores were equivalent. The TorCA can improve resource utilization by identifying patients with aMCI who may not require more resource-intensive neuropsychological assessment. Future studies will focus on cross-validating the TorCA for aMCI, and validation for disorders other than aMCI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Psychology 16 15%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 45 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,392,024
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#506
of 1,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,629
of 342,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.