You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc6118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel De Backer, Steven Hollenberg, Christiaan Boerma, Peter Goedhart, Gustavo Büchele, Gustavo Ospina-Tascon, Iwan Dobbe, Can Ince |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 329 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 13% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 81 | 23% |
| Unknown | 52 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 213 | 62% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 6% |
| Engineering | 16 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,369,982
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,112
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,967
of 82,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.