↓ Skip to main content

Safety, tolerability and appropriate use of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety, tolerability and appropriate use of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Published in
Respiratory Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12931-015-0276-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamera Corte, Francesco Bonella, Bruno Crestani, Maurits G. Demedts, Luca Richeldi, Carl Coeck, Katy Pelling, Manuel Quaresma, Joseph A. Lasky

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease characterised by dyspnea and loss of lung function. Using pooled data from the replicate, randomized, 52-week, placebo-controlled INPULSIS(®) trials, we characterized the safety and tolerability of nintedanib 150 mg twice daily in patients with IPF and described how adverse events were managed during these trials. One thousand and sixty- one patients were treated (nintedanib 638; placebo 423). Higher proportions of patients in the nintedanib group than the placebo group had ≥1 dose reduction to 100 mg bid (27.9 % versus 3.8 %) or treatment interruption (23.7 % versus 9.9 %). Adverse events led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 19.3 % and 13.0 % of patients in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively. Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event, reported in 62.4 % of patients in the nintedanib group versus 18.4 % in the placebo group; however, only 4.4 % of nintedanib-treated patients discontinued trial medication prematurely due to diarrhea. Monitoring of liver enzymes before and periodically during nintedanib treatment was recommended so that liver enzyme elevations could be managed through dose reduction or treatment interruption. Nintedanib had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in patients with IPF. Recommendations for adverse event management minimized permanent treatment discontinuations in the INPULSIS(®) trials. clinicaltrials.gov NCT01335464 and NCT01335477.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Other 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 49 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#787
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,278
of 285,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.