You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Application of ordinal logistic regression analysis in determining risk factors of child malnutrition in Bangladesh
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sumonkanti Das, Rajwanur M Rahman |
Abstract |
The study attempts to develop an ordinal logistic regression (OLR) model to identify the determinants of child malnutrition instead of developing traditional binary logistic regression (BLR) model using the data of Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2004. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 198 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 44 | 22% |
Researcher | 23 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 15% |
Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Mathematics | 16 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
Other | 45 | 23% |
Unknown | 61 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2012.
All research outputs
#13,125,620
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#996
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,128
of 141,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#30
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.