↓ Skip to main content

ISPD mutations account for a small proportion of Italian Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy cases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ISPD mutations account for a small proportion of Italian Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy cases
Published in
BMC Neurology, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0428-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Magri, Irene Colombo, Roberto Del Bo, Stefano Previtali, Roberta Brusa, Patrizia Ciscato, Marina Scarlato, Dario Ronchi, Maria Grazia D’Angelo, Stefania Corti, Maurizio Moggio, Nereo Bresolin, Giacomo Pietro Comi

Abstract

Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (LGMD), caused by defective α-dystroglycan (α-DG) glycosylation, was recently associated with mutations in Isoprenoid synthase domain-containing (ISPD) and GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase B (GMPPB) genes. The frequency of ISPD and GMPPB gene mutations in the LGMD population is unknown. We investigated the contributions of ISPD and GMPPB genes in a cohort of 174 Italian patients with LGMD, including 140 independent probands. Forty-one patients (39 probands) from this cohort had not been genetically diagnosed. The contributions of ISPD and GMPPB were estimated by sequential α-DG immunohistochemistry (IHC) and mutation screening in patients with documented α-DG defect, or by direct DNA sequencing of both genes when muscle tissue was unavailable. We performed α-DG IHC in 27/39 undiagnosed probands: 24 subjects had normal α-DG expression, two had a partial deficiency, and one exhibited a complete absence of signal. Direct sequencing of ISPD and GMPPB revealed two heterozygous ISPD mutations in the individual who lacked α-DG IHC signal: c.836-5 T > G (which led to the deletion of exon 6 and the production of an out-of-frame transcript) and c.676 T > C (p.Tyr226His). This patient presented with sural hypertrophy and tip-toed walking at 5 years, developed moderate proximal weakness, and was fully ambulant at 42 years. The remaining 12/39 probands did not exhibit pathogenic sequence variation in either gene. ISPD mutations are a rare cause of LGMD in the Italian population, accounting for less than 1 % of the entire cohort studied (FKRP mutations represent 10 %), while GMPPB mutations are notably absent in this patient sample. These data suggest that the genetic heterogeneity of LGMD with and without α-DG defects is greater than previously realized.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,292,660
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#2,140
of 2,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,515
of 274,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#62
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.