↓ Skip to main content

Maternal health care visits as predictors of contraceptive use among childbearing women in a medically underserved state in Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 623)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal health care visits as predictors of contraceptive use among childbearing women in a medically underserved state in Nigeria
Published in
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41043-018-0150-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Idowu Ajayi, Oladele Vincent Adeniyi, Wilson Akpan

Abstract

Health care visits during pregnancy, childbirth and after childbirth may be crucial in expanding the uptake of contraceptive care in resource-poor settings. However, little is known about how health care visits influence the uptake of modern contraception in Nigeria. The focus of this paper was to examine how health care visits influence the use of contraceptives among parous women in a medically underserved setting. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. Data was collected from 411 women who gave birth between 2010 and 2015 selected through a two-stage cluster random sampling technique. Health care visits for antenatal care services, childbirth, postnatal care and modern contraceptive were dichotomised (yes, no). Descriptive analyses were performed, and percentages, frequencies and means were reported. Multiple logistic regressions were computed, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Knowledge of all contraceptive methods was lowest among women who reside in rural areas. Health care visits for antenatal care (UOR 4.5; 95% CI 2.0-10.5), childbirth (UOR2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.2) and postnatal care services (UOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.5-3.5) independently predict ever use of any contraceptive methods. Likewise, health care visits for antenatal care (UOR 5.6; 95% CI 2.1-14.8), childbirth (UOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.5-3.6) and postnatal care services (UOR 2.8; 95% CI 1.8-4.5) were independent predictors of current use of modern contraceptive methods. In the adjusted model, health care visits for antenatal care services (AOR 3.2; 95% CI 1.1-8.8) were significantly associated with the use of modern contraceptive methods. Health care visits significantly predict the use of modern contraceptive methods. Expanding access to health care services would potentially increase contraceptive use among childbearing women in the medically underserved settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 50 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 15%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Computer Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 56 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#961,021
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#22
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,407
of 340,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them