↓ Skip to main content

Measurement properties of physical function scales validated for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measurement properties of physical function scales validated for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of the literature
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martijn AH Oude Voshaar, Peter M ten Klooster, Erik Taal, Mart AFJ van de Laar

Abstract

The aim of this study was to systematically review the content validity and measurement properties of all physical function (PF) scales which are currently validated for use with patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 97 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 34%
Psychology 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2011.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,449
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,829
of 154,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.