↓ Skip to main content

A two-stage microbial association mapping framework with advanced FDR control

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A two-stage microbial association mapping framework with advanced FDR control
Published in
Microbiome, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40168-018-0517-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiyuan Hu, Hyunwook Koh, Linchen He, Menghan Liu, Martin J. Blaser, Huilin Li

Abstract

In microbiome studies, it is important to detect taxa which are associated with pathological outcomes at the lowest definable taxonomic rank, such as genus or species. Traditionally, taxa at the target rank are tested for individual association, followed by the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure to control for false discovery rate (FDR). However, this approach neglects the dependence structure among taxa and may lead to conservative results. The taxonomic tree of microbiome data represents alignment from phylum to species rank and characterizes evolutionary relationships across microbial taxa. Taxa that are closer on the tree usually have similar responses to the exposure (environment). The statistical power in microbial association tests can be enhanced by efficiently employing the prior evolutionary information via the taxonomic tree. We propose a two-stage microbial association mapping framework (massMap) which uses grouping information from the taxonomic tree to strengthen statistical power in association tests at the target rank. massMap first screens the association of taxonomic groups at a pre-selected higher taxonomic rank using a powerful microbial group test OMiAT. The method then proceeds to test the association for each candidate taxon at the target rank within the significant taxonomic groups identified in the first stage. Hierarchical BH (HBH) and selected subset testing (SST) procedures are evaluated to control the FDR for the two-stage structured tests. Our simulations show that massMap incorporating OMiAT and the advanced FDR controlling methodologies largely alleviates the multiplicity issue. It is statistically more powerful than the traditional association mapping directly at the target rank while controlling the FDR at desired levels under most scenarios. In our real data analyses, massMap detects more or the same amount of associated species with smaller adjusted p values compared to the traditional method, which further illustrates the efficiency of the proposed framework. The R package of massMap is publicly available at https://sites.google.com/site/huilinli09/software and https://github.com/JiyuanHu/ . massMap is a novel microbial association mapping framework and achieves additional efficiency by utilizing the intrinsic taxonomic structure of microbiome data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Mathematics 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,714,764
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#665
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,307
of 331,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.