↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic and functional analysis of monocyte populations in cattle peripheral blood identifies a subset with high endocytic and allogeneic T-cell stimulatory capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic and functional analysis of monocyte populations in cattle peripheral blood identifies a subset with high endocytic and allogeneic T-cell stimulatory capacity
Published in
Veterinary Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13567-015-0246-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yolanda Corripio-Miyar, Jayne Hope, Colin J McInnes, Sean R Wattegedera, Kirsty Jensen, Yvonne Pang, Gary Entrican, Elizabeth J Glass

Abstract

Circulating monocytes in several mammalian species can be subdivided into functionally distinct subpopulations based on differential expression of surface molecules. We confirm that bovine monocytes express CD172a and MHC class II with two distinct populations of CD14(+)CD16(low/-)CD163(+) and CD14(-)CD16(++)CD163(low-) cells, and a more diffuse population of CD14(+)CD16(+)CD163(+) cells. In contrast, ovine monocytes consisted of only a major CD14(+)CD16(+) subset and a very low percentage of CD14(-)CD16(++)cells. The bovine subsets expressed similar levels of CD80, CD40 and CD11c molecules and mRNA encoding CD115. However, further mRNA analyses revealed that the CD14(-)CD16(++) monocytes were CX3CR1(high)CCR2(low) whereas the major CD14(+) subset was CX3CR1(low)CCR2(high). The former were positive for CD1b and had lower levels of CD11b and CD86 than the CD14(+) monocytes. The more diffuse CD14(+)CD16(+) population generally expressed intermediate levels of these molecules. All three populations responded to stimulation with phenol-extracted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by producing interleukin (IL)-1β, with the CD16(++) subset expressing higher levels of IL-12 and lower levels of IL-10. The CD14(-)CD16(++) cells were more endocytic and induced greater allogeneic T cell responses compared to the other monocyte populations. Taken together the data show both similarities and differences between the classical, intermediate and non-classical definitions of monocytes as described for other mammalian species, with additional potential subpopulations. Further functional analyses of these monocyte populations may help explain inter-animal and inter-species variations to infection, inflammation and vaccination in ruminant livestock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,913
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#786
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,045
of 286,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.