↓ Skip to main content

Healthy babies through infant-centered feeding protocol: an intervention targeting early childhood obesity in vulnerable populations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Healthy babies through infant-centered feeding protocol: an intervention targeting early childhood obesity in vulnerable populations
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-868
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mildred A Horodynski, Beth Olson, Susan Baker, Holly Brophy-Herb, Garry Auld, Laurie Van Egeren, Joel Lindau, Lisa Singleterry

Abstract

Poor feeding practices during infancy contribute to obesity risk. As infants transition from human milk and/or formula-based diets to solid foods, these practices interfere with infant feeding self-regulation and healthy growth patterns. Compared with other socioeconomic groups, lower-income mothers are more likely to experience difficulty feeding their infants. This may include misinterpreting feeding cues and using less-than-optimal feeding styles and practices, such as pressuring infants during mealtimes and prematurely introducing solid food and sweetened beverages. The Healthy Babies trial aims to determine the efficacy of a community-based randomized controlled trial of an in-home intervention with economically and educationally disadvantaged mother-infant dyads. The educational intervention is being conducted during the infant's first 6 months of life to promote healthy transition to solids during their first year and is based on the theory of planned behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 293 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 19%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 66 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Social Sciences 40 14%
Psychology 31 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 79 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2011.
All research outputs
#4,143,164
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,637
of 14,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,995
of 141,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#44
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.