↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging combined with functional neuronavigation in resection of low-grade temporal lobe tumors

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging combined with functional neuronavigation in resection of low-grade temporal lobe tumors
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12957-015-0690-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shao-cong Bai, Bai-nan Xu, Shi-hui Wei, Jie-feng Geng, Dong-dong Wu, Xin-guang Yu, Xiao-lei Chen

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of intraoperative MR imaging in temporal lobe low-grade glioma (LGG) surgery and to report the surgical outcome in our series with regard to seizures, neurological defects, and quality of life. Patients with temporal lobe contrast-nonenhancing gliomas who presented with seizures in the course of their disease were enrolled in our prospective study. We non-randomly assigned patients to undergo intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI)-guided surgery or conventional surgery. Extent of resection (EOR) and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Forty-one patients were allocated in the iMRI group, and 14 were in the conventional group. Comparable EOR was achieved for the two groups (p = 0.634) although preoperative tumor volumes were significantly larger for the iMRI group. Seizure outcome tended to be better for the iMRI group (Engel class I achieved for 89.7 % (35/39) vs 75 % (9/12)) although this difference was not statistically different. Newly developed neurological deficits were observed in four patients (10.3 %) and two patients (16.7 %), respectively (p = 0.928). Free of seizures and neurological morbidity led to a return-to-work or return-to-school rate of 84.6 % (33/39) vs 75 % (9/12), respectively (p = 0.741). Our study provided evidence that iMRI was a safe and useful tool in temporal lobe LGG surgery. Optimal extent of resection contributed to favorable seizure outcome in our series with low morbidity rate, which led to a high return-to-work rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 37%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Psychology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,347,611
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#610
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,936
of 274,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.